- Sojourn
- Pilgrim
- From: California
- Registered: 2009-10-08
- Posts: 7
Questions
I'm about halfway through TGAT, with this being my umpteenth reread since I picked the series up at 13. Several questions keep bugging me that I thought I'd share.
Forgive me if these have already been discussed.
1 - Nisses: It's implied by Cadrach when he's spilling his guts to Miri that when Nisses came down from the north, he already had great power and knowledge, which allowed Fingil to conquer Asu'a. Was he sent by the Norn Queen as a kind of subtle attack against the Sithi.
2. What is the difference between death and unbeing? Is there one?
3. The master witnesses - not trying to mix too much science with magic - but wave harmonics seems to be a mode of their power. Any thoughts.
4. Finally, it's inferred that Camaris and Amerasu were possibly lovers. Or am I stretching things.
Anyway, all my research back and forth through the volumes and I'm still wondering about these. Many others of course, but I always come back to these.
- Sgtcampsalot
- Pilgrim
- From: North Carolina
- Registered: 2009-08-04
- Posts: 34
- Website
Re: Questions
Valid thoughts in an analysis!
2] I feel like a state of being that he entered as a direct result of what happened to him. Like, he only came into that state BECAUSE of the cause of his "death"? Y'know? And Ineluki's skill and adeptness at "The Art" allowed his mind/essence to continue to have an effect even when in that state. ... BUT, I never liked this device used in fantasies (LOTR, Harry Potter, TONS of others in history) because of the implausibility of it within the world it takes place. It's never really explained AT ALL, which is my biggest problem. It would be nice to have some explanation IN THE CONTEXT of the book's universe to help understand the state. Shadowmarch's "in between" is a valid way of thinking about it... sort of. Also Orsen Scott Card's "Ender's Game" series has an amazing theory with that kind of thing (the "outside") and he uses "science" to explain it, which I loved. Anybody read those books? But also the idea of "The Art" I see as the natural essence of the universe/world, and there are some ways in which being can "control" it or manipulate it in some way. Sort of like in Harry Potter how they need wands to do magic because "magic" is a natural thing, but it is too erratic to contain naturally, it must be manipulated artificially... y'know?... hah.
3] That seems legit. I like it.
4] I always assumed that. I think Tad INTENDED to leave that ambiguous, but I always assumed it was something of that nature. We could also draw theories about if any of the characters (main, or mentioned) were offspring of such an affair? Though that'd have to be backed up a lot, haha.
- Neemo
- Pilgrim
- From: Hamilton, ON, CA
- Registered: 2005-03-28
- Posts: 733
- Website
Re: Questions
1) I doubt it, Ineluki as one of the SIthi at the time, and rimmersmen cam to destroy the immortals...tey seemed to have hates th norns and the sithi equaly
2) well death would be like dying then bing reborn as someone/someting else...reincarnation kinda thing...unbeing would be gone forever.,..so if you dont believe in reincarnation then yeah i would say they are the same
3) i think that the Funderling long distance communication is another play on the same idea...prolly was orignally gotten from LoTR seeing stones
4) possible...even look for a parallel from Aditu and Simon...Sithi seem to be pretty flirty and open about that sort of thing..i know it never got that far with simon and aditu but she had fun teasing him :)
- Sojourn
- Pilgrim
- From: California
- Registered: 2009-10-08
- Posts: 7
Re: Questions
I forgot about the Funderlings. That sounds feasible. I'm still not sure about the death/unbeing question. Kuroyi and others seem to indicate some kind of distinction.
I haven't read Ender's Game (it's on my ever growing list of books to read). I'll have to check it out.
- Dimma
- Pilgrim
- Registered: 2010-06-12
- Posts: 16
Re: Questions
Sojourn wrote:3. The master witnesses - not trying to mix too much science with magic - but wave harmonics seems to be a mode of their power. Any thoughts.
It might be the same as when they dream (I don't know what it's called in the English volumes - is it "dream way"?)
And when they traverse that dream way they can get in contact with Ineluki and the Red Hand, and they are in the "unbeing" state.
If the master witnesses are connected with wave harmonics, it seems to imply "unbeing" is also wave harmonics.
To tie that thread together, we have the harp in Nakkiga which is a harmonical instrument, and Ineluki speaks through it. So I think you're right about wave harmonics being a mode of at least that master witness (maybe the question is, is that mode universal in MST?)
Sojourn wrote:4. Finally, it's inferred that Camaris and Amerasu were possibly lovers. Or am I stretching things.
I currently reread all the volumes, and have two volumes left, is it in those that this was inferred?
Last edited by Dimma (2010-09-03 11:05:30)
- Sojourn
- Pilgrim
- From: California
- Registered: 2009-10-08
- Posts: 7
Re: Questions
"There are secrets so dark, so deep, that the only way to discover them is to tear open the universe and root about in the very guts of Death and Unbeing." "Death? Unbeing? Are they not the same?" "Oh, no, Majesty. Not remotely."
page 31 of TGAT - a discussion between Elias and Pryrates.
Concerning Camaris and Amerasu, most of that theory comes from the fact that Amerasu kept his presence among the Sithi as a total secret, even from her closest family. Also, Aditu mentions to Geloe that before Camaris regained his wits, she caught him singing along with her one of Amerasu's favorite songs. That infers a kind of intimacy between the two.
So...still not sure about death and unbeing.
- Firsfron of Ronchester
- Mantis
- From: Ronchester
- Registered: 2001-06-04
- Posts: 9182
- Website
Re: Questions
*TGAT spoilers* *TGAT spoilers* *TGAT spoilers* *TGAT spoilers* *TGAT spoilers* *TGAT spoilers* *TGAT spoilers* *TGAT spoilers* *TGAT spoilers* *TGAT spoilers*
IMO Camaris was too straight-laced and religious to ever consider a romance with any Sitha-woman. And, after all, it was his overwhelming guilt about an illicit romance which drove him to Jao e-Tinukai'i in the first place...
Not to mention: Amerasu was roughly 5,000 years old! And still dressed in white (the Sithi color of mourning) after the death of her husband, son, and people at the time. Amerasu kept his presence there a secret because humans were not allowed there, not because she was secretly romancing humans.
Aditu was under 300 years old, very young for one of her people. She wasn't old, wizened, and thousands of years old.
- Sojourn
- Pilgrim
- From: California
- Registered: 2009-10-08
- Posts: 7
Re: Questions
*Sorry about the spoilers, there are more ahead*
Yeah, still not convinced. He was straight laced and very religious, but human. Sleeping with his closest friend's wife (not to mention his King) and fathering a son by her shows that. I know he was in grief because of that transgression, but why would Amerasu even take him in? It's mentioned at the end of TGAT that Eahlstan reached out to the Sithi, and that Amerasu reached back, using Jiriki as a messenger and go between. However, there was no indication that Eahlstan or any other mortal actually went to Jao e Tinukai'i before Camaris.
Also, Strangyeard, who took the confession of Camaris, told Jiriki that Camaris' stay with Amerasu had nothing to do with Ineluki's plans. Everything about Camaris' confession eventually gets revealed, except for what actually happened while he was with Amerasu. If he'd only visited with her, then why the need for a confession to Strangyeard. If nothing illicit happened between them, why be so secretive about it. Especially with what was at stake - why not tell all.
Guess we'll never know...unless Tad would care to enlighten us. Also, this may sound strange, but the way Amerasu and Camaris are portrayed in the books (gentle, wise, strong in their respective ways, but also lonely) I can see them bonding at some level.
- Firsfron of Ronchester
- Mantis
- From: Ronchester
- Registered: 2001-06-04
- Posts: 9182
- Website
Re: Questions
*Spoiler city* *Spoiler city* *Spoiler city* *Spoiler city* *Spoiler city* *Spoiler city* *Spoiler city* *Spoiler city* *Spoiler city*
Sojourn wrote:*Sorry about the spoilers, there are more ahead*
Yeah, still not convinced. He was straight laced and very religious, but human. Sleeping with his closest friend's wife (not to mention his King) and fathering a son by her shows that. I know he was in grief because of that transgression, but why would Amerasu even take him in?
Dunno, but it's not because she wanted him. ;)
Perhaps she realized that he, in the condition he was in, was no threat to her people. Perhaps she sensed the deep sadness within him. Perhaps she knew he was part of Presbyter John's court, and wanted access to John's own right-hand man.
It's mentioned at the end of TGAT that Eahlstan reached out to the Sithi, and that Amerasu reached back, using Jiriki as a messenger and go between. However, there was no indication that Eahlstan or any other mortal actually went to Jao e Tinukai'i before Camaris.
Getting an invite into Jao e-Tinukai'i is a far cry from becoming the lover of the ancient matriarch of the Sithi. And she was indeed ancient, even 40 years prior to the beginning of "The Dragonbone Chair".
Also, Strangyeard, who took the confession of Camaris, told Jiriki that Camaris' stay with Amerasu had nothing to do with Ineluki's plans. Everything about Camaris' confession eventually gets revealed, except for what actually happened while he was with Amerasu. If he'd only visited with her, then why the need for a confession to Strangyeard.
Camaris's confession was about his affair with Ebekah, the Rose of Hernysadharc, not Amerasu, ancient Dowager Queen of the Sithi.
If nothing illicit happened between them, why be so secretive about it. Especially with what was at stake - why not tell all.
Guess we'll never know...unless Tad would care to enlighten us. Also, this may sound strange, but the way Amerasu and Camaris are portrayed in the books (gentle, wise, strong in their respective ways, but also lonely) I can see them bonding at some level.
*Imagines*
Camaris: So, Amerasu... Nice... nice tree you have here. The cobwebs are... quite extensive...
Amerasu: They signify the deep mourning I feel for the deaths of my husband, son, and people, at the hands of mortals. It is why I dress in mourning white, mortal man. I have spent over 500 years in the dark here, reflecting on my sorrows.
Camaris: You know, you're 5,000 years old... I'm nearly 50. We've got a lot in common...
Amerasu: Your closest friend murdered my people and scourged us from the land!
Camaris: Yes, but I betrayed him. I could... do so again, if you know what I mean... ;)
Of course, this is an exercise in pure silliness, but I truly do not know what Camaris and Amerasu have in common, other than being sad for a long time. Certainly nothing sexual.
Last edited by Firsfron of Ronchester (2010-09-04 17:41:51)
- Sojourn
- Pilgrim
- From: California
- Registered: 2009-10-08
- Posts: 7
Re: Questions
*spoilers* *spoilers* *spoilers*
I can buy a few of those, although I don't know what the age difference - vast as it is - really has to do with anything.
As you say, an exercise in silliness, although that's what keeps these books so alive for me. I've been reading them faithfully for nearly twenty years, and they never get old.
But what I really want to know (everyone digressed with Camaris and Amerasu) is what the heck is the difference between death and unbeing (I know, I'm stuck on this one).
- Firsfron of Ronchester
- Mantis
- From: Ronchester
- Registered: 2001-06-04
- Posts: 9182
- Website
Re: Questions
Sojourn wrote:*spoilers* *spoilers* *spoilers*
I can buy a few of those, although I don't know what the age difference - vast as it is - really has to do with anything.
As you say, an exercise in silliness, although that's what keeps these books so alive for me. I've been reading them faithfully for nearly twenty years, and they never get old.
I feel exactly the same way, Sojourn.
But what I really want to know (everyone digressed with Camaris and Amerasu) is what the heck is the difference between death and unbeing (I know, I'm stuck on this one).
I think the concept of "Unbeing" is quite similar to the concept of "Undead". Death is to undead as being is to unbeing. So unbeing is no longer existing, but it's also not 'non-existence'. There's still a trace of something there.
- Sojourn
- Pilgrim
- From: California
- Registered: 2009-10-08
- Posts: 7
Re: Questions
*spoilers* *spoilers*
Which would explain why someone in an existence of unbeing could be contacted via the dream road and the witnesses. Those in that state would exist more as dreams, as living thought, than corporeal forms.
Thanks, that helps. I'd also forgotten about the conversations between the Sithi and Eolair about haunting's around Naglimund. That would indicate spiritual activity, or those in a state of unbeing.
Thanks for the help on that. I think I can cross that one off the list now.
- Dimma
- Pilgrim
- Registered: 2010-06-12
- Posts: 16
Re: Questions
Is it ever stated in MST what happens in death? (Except e.g. Hernystiri or Rimmersgard beliefs). It seemed to me that unbeing is the only "dead" state which can communicate with beings still alive.
Sojourn wrote:Also, Aditu mentions to Geloe that before Camaris regained his wits, she caught him singing along with her one of Amerasu's favorite songs.
I wonder if Camaris was kept there quite long, kinda like Simon? Maybe he had to hear Amerasu sing if she was the only one he was allowed to meet.
It is strange though.
- Kenan
- Pilgrim
- From: Sweden
- Registered: 2005-06-19
- Posts: 227
Re: Questions
First off, the beautiful thing with really great literature is the questions which can never be answered, but which we no less long to know the truth about. I love that.
I don't have any answers.
1. Nisses? I never considered it. Utukku's plans were long in the making, so why not? At the same time, I don't see her giving power to men in that way.
2. Death and unbeing? Consider that the answer may be different depending on your race or belief. How does death work for the Sithi and Norns? How does it work in a world where Aedon is god? Can there be one answer? I thought that death was not final, but unbeing was. Utukku longed for unbeing, I think Amerasu claims. I think she means Utukku longs for a final end. Whereas Ineluki did not die but was cast into unbeing (I like the comparison to undeath).
3. I can offer no insight here
4. Camaris and Amerasu... I don't see why. There is nothing to suggest it. Amerasu kept Camaris secret and allowed him time away from other humans. Like stated before me, I don't think he would "sin" further.
cheers!
|
|
|
|
|