Trying to Write About Writing Newsletter from Tad, August 2017

Tad Williams Newsletter August 2017

Trying to write about writing is always hard. Because so much of the process is not only ineffable but highly individual. For instance, I do a huge amount of writing on my back. This is not actually recommended for everyone—it takes years of training to stay awake long enough to have good ideas before drifting off into a well-deserved nap. Not to mention starting out your thinking process far enough from the outer edge of the mattress that you don’t fall off when snoring…oops…when thinking particularly hard.

More seriously, though, as I’ve told you before, I do like to do most of my thinking before I actually sit down at the keyboard (and that thinking is often done horizontally) because it gives me a chance to run a zillion thought-experiments and find out ahead of time what works and what definitely doesn’t work. That means when I’m actually writing the scene, I’m not worried too much about what in theater we’d call the “blocking”—the physical details of moving actors around the stage—and can concentrate on things like the atmosphere and the interaction of characters.

(This is particularly important with scenes where lots of action or other physical things are happening, or locations are changing. Otherwise you wind up in the middle of an intense bit of explication and suddenly realize the door that’s supposed to swing open to reveal SOMETHING ASTOUNDING actually swings the other direction, or was proclaimed “locked” in an earlier part of the scene, or is in fact a window.)

This happens on a larger scale, too, of course, because like most who write at this ridiculous length, I have many timelines and plotlines intersecting. Something that might work chronologically—that is, be more or less in line with the timeframe of the scenes around it—still might not work out dramatically. You have to balance the effect on the reader of things learned, things experienced, and the ambience created. For instance, no matter how well linked they are in terms of one following another in a time sequence, you don’t usually want to have three or four high-energy scenes in a row. Similarly, if the scenes dovetail beautifully but the chronology is really confusing—you’ve flashed back thirty years in the middle of a bunch of very of-the-present-moment scenes—then you’ll jerk the reader back out of Ye Olde Disbelief Suspension.

As a writer, you don’t have to be WRONG or do something obviously stupid to destroy that famed suspension. You can commit this faux pas simply by forcing the reader to do too much considering and reconciling when they should be pulled forward by what’s happening on the page.

Thought is never the enemy of a good read. Too much thought for the wrong reasons definitely is.

But writing my new one, Empire of Grass, I have a slightly different problem at this moment, which is that since I’m approaching the end of the book (well, my first draft, anyway) I do ramp up the action/suspense, and thus sometimes I do have to string together several fairly highly-charged scenes. End-of-book or crucial-turning-point can outweigh other considerations. (See? It’s complicated.)

In situations like those I’m working with at the moment, I need to invent little ways to relieve the tension every now and then or else the reader will simply get over-buzzed and the reactions you want—empathy, curiosity, fear for the protagonists, fear of the antagonists—will begin to dull. In fact it’s very similar to what’s called “compassion fatigue”: the first time we are told about something horrible, we want to do something about it right this moment. The second time an hour later, we are a little less empathetic, a little more detached, and the returns continue to diminish with repetition, at least over a short turn. Same is true with a story. If I tell you, “Oh my God so and so is in terrible danger!” you will be involved. If I say, “So and so is in terrible danger again only minutes later…!”—well, you get it.

So at the climax of a story, even if it’s just a volume of a longer story, the writer needs to vary things. You need to think like a reader (lucky thing most writers are readers, huh?) The writer needs to slip in a little bit of humor or a moment of beauty or interesting reflection that will give the reader a chance to catch her or his breath.

Because that’s another important detail. If readers don’t breathe, you have dead readers.

Look, I’m a pro. I’m telling you important stuff here. DON’T KILL YOUR READERS—that’s always been one of the most important rules.

And I offer this valuable lesson to you, my friends, absolutely free.

This page has been viewed 563 times with 1 visits today.

3 thoughts on “Trying to Write About Writing Newsletter from Tad, August 2017

  1. I really dig this article. It’s always a challenge to find the balance between maintaining that rev and knowing where to place a natural pause in the action. I sometimes feel myself going all Michael Bay.

  2. I’m glad your master plan includes the very important, do not kill the readers. Now, sleep deprivation is often a danger I personally face when reading your writing.

Comments are closed.